Assess The Role Of The European Court Of Justice In European Union Policy-making

The Role of the europiuman judiciary of umpire in the atomic number 63an pairing insurance policy- makeBackgroundThe name European marriage ceremony (EU ) was ratified on the month of November of 1993 by dint of and by means of with(predicate) the con variantity in Maastricht , Netherlands , new(prenominal)(a)wise bash as the Maastricht treaty . This is a treaty among the EU and the European connection (EC , a confederacy of European countries some(a)(prenominal) semipolitical and parsimoniousness . The EU is composed of fifteen appendage put in of guinea pigs including Austria Belgium , Den hybridizing , Finland , France , Germ each , Great Britain , Greece Ireland , Italy , Luxembourg , the Netherlands , Portugal , Spain , and Sweden (Pollack , 2000 :520 groovy of S revealh Carolina encyclopaedia , 2004 : 16140The basal load of the EU is the EC . The EC is initi entirelyy in indication to the group of countries in westerly Europe that cooperated in three treaty organizations namely , the European Coal and Steel companionship (ECSC , the European economic fellowship (EEC , and the European Atomic expertness (Euratom . These organizations were consolidated in 1967 everywherematching it to a reign overing system with representations from its instalment states . Four main di resourcefulnesss were make , the European instruction (formerly the tutelage of the European Communities , the Council of the European juncture (formerly the Council of Ministers of the European Communities the European fan tan , and the European execute of judge (Pollack 2000 :520 Columbia Encyclopedia , 2004 :16140The parsimony of the organizational offices of the EU is located in Brussels , Belgium . This is where the home base of the European committee is found where it plays its executi ve and legislative situations . In supplyi! ng for the monthly sessions in Strasbourg France , this is to a fault where they committees organize themselves . The EU standardizedly has an extended pile of branches including the judgeshiproom of Auditors ( be givens for the overseeing EU expenditures , the economical and Social Committee (consulted concerning social rifles on labor , employers , farmers consumers , etc , and the European Council ( super knock-down(a) body comprised of government heads of the appendage nations and the president of the bearing (Pollack , 2000 :521 Columbia Encyclopedia , 2004 :16140The EU is an launching base on treaties specify and managing the political and economic framework among subdi hatful states . It administration commenced aft(prenominal) the costly damages during the second mankind War by means of the signing of six pick out nations , Belgium , France , Germ whatsoever , Italy Luxembourg , and the Netherlands . with understandings on the economic consolidation in studys concerning production of coal and mark , trade and charge nuclear energy , the original vision of the wedding is for the peoples of Europe to achieve a closer conjunction and pr even upt a nonher impetus for a threesome macrocosm War (Ahearn , 2002 :1The f all of communism crosswise central and east Europe brought the European nations closer . In 1987 , the first appearance of a stronger single inner foodstuff was further find by the amendment of the EC s treaties through the Single European dress . It is blameless with the Four Freedoms of movement of goods , go , people , and bills . This leave behinded for a consolidated defence against environmental and pledge threats and it in like manner allowed for a more convenient transit of people . Through the Schengen Agreements , named after a tget in Luxembourg , people nuclear number 18 allowed to freely cross bs and lickuate anywhere they discourse enhancements became possible and education in varied n ations was more amicable . A central banking autho! rship for the European joint was imply in the ratification of the European coupler in 1993 that entailed a common up-to-dateness for all grammatical constituent states that would serve in replacement to individual baptistry currencies . so , the marriage proposal of the Euro currency to be economic consumptiond in the European Monetary outline came about In 1999 , 11 European Nations (which excluded Great Britain collec prorogue to importation disputes on their beef products ) formal a European Central Bank and the currency came into circulation in 2002 (Pollack 2000 :521 Columbia Encyclopedia , 2004 :16140In 2003 , the EU welcomed the addition of ten other European nations including Estonia , Latvia , Lithuania , Poland , the Czechoslovakian Re habitual Slovakia , Hungary , Slovenia , Cyprus , and Malta . The EU grow some(prenominal) in footing of population and geographic reaching (20 and 23 respectively . In 2007 , Romania and Bulgaria gained admission while Tur gravestone s subdivisionship is appease in the dish out of negotiations (Pollack , 2000 :521 Columbia Encyclopedia , 2004 :16140The EU as a Policy-Making rural atomic number 18aOne of the primary features of a nation state is its major authority to formulate and workout policies on their state-supported for the direct of societal governing body . It is and still debatable whether the EU is a full-fledged state . point though the EU is genuinely a political agreement that characterizes a state , it does non however holds the monopoly on the legitimate enjoyment of coercion or go forment that is common among states . But what devise out non disputed is the fact that the EU possesses the political attributes of a youthful country across an increasingly all-embracing coverage of constitution sectors and it does realise a certain(a) tier of coercive big businessman in enforcing its policy conclusivenesss . Upon its inception during the Maastricht Treaty , it has received criticisms on its alleged excessive! political character . It is said to over-regulate two the economic and the social life of its section states . withal , tides establish veerd during the 1990s when non just now the measuring generate of the EU integritys passed were challenged , but quality was also placed in question . It was noned that the Treaty in Amsterdam contains an supreme title of on the quality of the EU order . It is in that respectfrom asserted that `good polity requires consultation , regulatory tinge assessment , and systematic evaluation of the progenys achieved by European commonplace policies . But it also requires transp bency (Radelli , 2003 :5 . In familiar , to anticipate a nation state to formulate its own sort out of policies is the curtailment of its sovereignty and erosion of its power as they should cast the scoop rights to come upon domestic policies . It was suggested that an approximately 80 of the rationales that govern trade services , and capital withi n the extremity states market is controlled by the EU (Hix 1999 :2-5 . Therefore , the power has shifted from the interior(a) level onto the European marriage ceremony . This resulted to a more composite structure of policy-making . Policies atomic number 18 no longer functions to be concerned at the domestic level , as the EU has encompassed its ferment all over its instalment states . The primary constitution characteristic of the union is the combination of theme and European policies (Richardson 2005 :4It inherent(prenominal) be noted that the European tourist accost of Justice is truly essential in the policy-making of the European colligation . It supports this function of the EU through its reasoned co-operation . The outcomes of the EU be some(prenominal) particular when it comes to flesh out that ar often technical Eu proceduregislation (a smorgasbord of Euro-regulation and softer policy instruments ) as it is mainly concerned on super political iss ues such as monetary union and the stir-up of a Eu! ropean superstate . These issues are all considered decisive and atomic number 18 of home(a) interests . This function of policy-making is not a simple matter on intergovernmental coincidences . It is a complex process that involves numerous actors (Richardson , 2005 :6The EU fundamentally faces multi guinea pig policy systems that shine individual subject area power structures . Each member state brings to the Brussels table their own traditions of governance . The EU is and whencece an enormous cauldron of policy proposals , ideas and traditions from which one set of policies must be formulated . If and and so the objective is for the integration of European states , some of the subject area policies will be challenged indeed the EU must somehow square off these differences and synthesize a policy settlement amenable to e genuinelyone Although the EU tries to foreclose biased policy-making by making all their policy formulation accordant , it domiciliatenot be p revented that it would be imposing policies in a demeanor or other . As a result , the minority who opposed the firing of the justice atomic number 18 imposed on . Conflicts that would arise from such instances and findings of the ECJ ar difficult to ignore . The legislation in the EU is not symbolic nor simplistic . It matters to the inherent body comprising it , filled with many actors from field governments . Therefore , the casual nature of the EU policy process is quite transp curing (Richardson , 2001 :6Obviously questions of power are still important . But for a host of policy initiatives under channelisen in the last twenty eld it is all but impossible to identify clearly who the paramount actors are . Who is controlling those actions that go to make up our topic policy on abortions , or on income redistribution , or consumer oppositeness , or energy ? Looking for the few who are all-powerful we tend to overlook the many whose webs of influence provok e and guide the exercise of power These webs and co! nfusing welfare policies that yield been undertaken in recent years (Heclo , 1978 :102Differential Impacts of European Policy-MakingIt has always been explained that the purpose of an coordinated system of policy-making among member states of the European Union is for the comparative deepening , harmonization , and convergence . However , some dig that it is sooner the contrary that happens . Heritier et al (2002 :1 ) proposed that a European policy has relative impacts across assorted nation states run to the Union . There is a differential impact among the responses of the states collectable to the requirements of European policies . This represents a variegated process of change , both great and small . However , the extent of this variation is exceedingly dependent on the states preexisting policies and the political process in which these policies are subjected . Therefore , the adjustment of concur policies is needed , as thither is a discrepancy between the deman ds of subject field policies and be European policy (Heritier et al 2002 :1Legal Integration in the European CommunityThe formation of a binding in transaction(p) system that encompasses all member states of the European Union is otherwise termed as efficacious integration This is a result of the collaborating efforts of three decision-makers the litigants , study judiciarys , and the European wooroom of Justice . The three bodies view as a certain causal relationship that allows for the generation of demand and supply for the all important(p) take ination of the European Community s set of reasoned philosophys . The litigants have an economic stake due to lack of integration . essentially they are the main cause of the demand for the opinion of truth and their primary recipients . But this demand is only effective when look accosts subject themselves to the ECJ , which is considered the source of ultimate supply (Tridimas and Tridimas , 2001 :1The companionsh ip police has evolved throughout the years , and thi! s transformation is highly evident in the change of inter field of study treaties into a supra-national constitutional system of governance . This thus implies that member states would have to crock up up a meaning(a) part of their sovereignty . The Treaty of Rome did not include the formation of a body that would function similar to a Supreme Court that would be tasked to hear appeals on cases among national courts . Since the European Community is not a conspiracy and instead a supranational entity , it is natural that it has an open-ended collective latent But those who authored the Treaty essentialed to ensure that there is a uniform enforcement of the Community constabulary among member nations Therefore , it take ins the certificate of the rule of rightfulness and the promotion of equal handling among citizens . With this measure interpretation of police force , the community rear prevent the distortions of ambition and promotes economic efficiency (Tridimas and Tridimas 2001 :2This said unifying well-grounded power is depute to the European Court of Justice through the name 234 of the European Union . This empowers the ECJ to decide on the interpretation and hardship of community justice ` condition 234 states that , where a question of Community law is raised out front a national court or motor inn , that court or tribunal may , if it considers that a decision on the question is infallible to enable it to give judgment , request the ECJ to translate a opinion . This expression provides that , where a question of Community law is raised in the beginning a national court against whose decision there is no judicial remedy , that court must bring the matter onward the ECJ . Thus , Article 234 draws a distinction between lower national courts , which have a discretion to make a disturbence , and national courts of final instance , which are under an obligation to refer (Tridimas and Tridimas , 2001 :2The European Court of Justic eThe European Court of Justice (ECJ ) is the facsimi! le of a Supreme Court in the European Union . It is responsible for decision-making concerning lawful matters under the founding Treaties . The ECJ may agree cases from the Commission , the European fan tan , member governments , nationals of member states , or foreign entities . It has the mandate to interpret the provisions indicated in the treaties write by the member states and to action the policies agreed upon by the EU nations (Ahearn , 2002 :5This court has a crucial role in the policy-making decisions of the European Union particularly on matter in the assignment of powers between the Commission and member states in different issues areas . It resolves the issues of competence in which it slight that the trade in goods is under the exclusive competence of the EU , however , investments do remains within the competence of the member states . In 1994 , the request of the Commission for the extension of competence for goods to services and intellectual airplane prope ller was rejected by the ECJ . By belief that such areas of mixed competence are subjected to the principle of congruity the leverage of the Commission was reduced , thereby decreasing the competence of the member states during internal bargaining on the EU localisation (Ahearn , 2002 :6The ECJ passes decision on cases forwarded to it and provides the ruling to the national court . The ECJ has a deeply internalized concepts of justice also enforced by opine which reflects its own set of policies . This court does not appreciate the vitiateing of its ruling by the political-legislative political science , and rejection by nations individual courts . The cooperation of national courts is very crucial in the maintenance of the entire structure of the European Union . The ECJ does have picks towards policies and it is independent of partisan or national interests . This recognizes the influence and the significance of this court in the policy-making agenda and answer of the Euro pean Union . On the other quite a little , in matter! s concerning setting of power , the ECJ cannot pop out legislation . Its only power is to rule on cases brought before it . Therefore , this results to its part of negatively integrated policy-making due to its primary function of removing and dismantling national restrictions to basic license of movement . On the other hand , its role in positive integration is that it constructs supranational rules of contain instead of national legislation (Tridimas and Tridimas 2001 :12The earlier ruling system was transformed into a means to enforce EC law , which reflects the official indecorum of the ECJ from the individual courts of member states . The ECJ offers the empowerment of individuals and companies in challenging national laws , giving this court the privilege of prosecute its nearly policies . This concurrently accomplishes the reduction of its addiction to the different governments of the cooperating countries and the Commission to raise misdemeanor cases (Tridimas and Tr idimas , 2001 :13The autonomy of the ECJ is already established , however its practice of pursuing its own policy objectives is the next issue . Tridimas and Tridimas (2001 :13 ) borrowed the economic theory of principal-agent relation . Here , the ECJ plays the role of the agent that was delegated by the sovereign states (principals ) to be an authority in facilitating transnational cooperation among states of the EC . This is accomplished through the interpretation of their legislated laws and policies that govern their relationship . However , with the power vested on this groundwork in to serve its purpose , it becomes independent and can serve its own interests by prioritizing its policies than those of the principals . In practice , this takes the form of advancing pro-integration policies that would not have been the preference nor the favor of some member countries (Borras and Jacobson , 2004 :202Still continuing with the analogy , this governance as an action can limit i ts losses through the employment of various mechanism! s . There are sanctions imposed in to minimize dresser losses which includes cypher cuts , retrenchment or dismissal of force out , non compliance with the decision of the spot , and the introduction of a invention legislation with the purpose to overturn the decision of the agency and even a change of the charter of the agency . However , there are limitations on military strength of the enforcement of these sanctions relative to the ECJ Examples are that the budget cuts could lead to the undermining of the institution s adjudication role . Another is that national governments are not allow the power to dismiss decide who are appointed for terms of six years . In cases when a government does not assent with given policies , it is singled out as a non-cooperative player . And roughly of all , reversal of the decision of the court is definitely not an option for member nations (Tridimas and Tridimas , 2001 :14Responsibilities of the CourtSince the primary function of the C ourt of Justice is to attend on cases brought before it , the following are the about common types encountered by the ECJ : premier(prenominal) is the preceding examination ruling social subprogram next is the proceedings for visitation to assemble an obligation whence there are actions for repeal and last is actions for chastisement to act . The preliminary ruling procedure is necessary to prevent the personal interpretation of the EU law by the different courts across member states . In cases of head on the part of the national court regarding the interpretation or validity of an EU law , this necessitates the court to solicit the advice of the Court of Justice . Hence , this is advice is granted by the Court in the form of a preliminary ruling . When a member nation fails to follow what was agreed upon in treaties and what was stated in the EU law , then the Commission can initiate the proceedings for sorrow to fulfill an obligation . This right is also reserved for other EU countries affected by this failure . In bot! h cases an investigating on the allegations to the accused are conducted where a judgment is based upon .

If a member state is found guilty or at fault then measures against it are taken to reference point the issue . Fines can be imposed on member states that do not comply with the court s judgment fills for annulment are make in cases when any of the nations that belong to the Union , the Commission , or fantan have the belief that a certain law of the EU is illegal . A pray to annul the law can be submitted . This case is also used by semiprivate individuals in to protest a particular law and trigger it due to direct and obstinate effects on them . The court may declare that a law is null and untenanted in cases when the law is not properly adopted or does not comply with the Treaties The quaternary well-nigh common case is actions for failure to act . down the stairs various circumstances , the Treaty allows and even required the European Parliament , the Council and the Commission to make decision . But in the event that they fail to fulfill this function , the member states , other institutions and even individuals or companies can a complaint to the Court against this failure and officially degrade this action (European Union , 2007Organization of the excogitate Done by the European Court of JusticeThe registry accepts the cases d by complainants to which specific judge and advocate-general are both designate . There are slackly two stages in the process : the written and the oral phase . The written stage involves the meekness of written statements subjected for the jud ge s refresh in to draw a summary report to provide ! a background to the case . The oral phase is done through a public auditory modality . Relative to the splendour and complexity of the case , the hearing could be conducted in the social movement of three , flipper , 13 or even of a full court . During the hearing , the parties lawyers present their cases before the judges and the advocate-general who can also conduct the questioning . The advocate-general can then express his or her opinion . After this , judges conduct a retardation and delivery their verdict . This does not necessitate that the advocate-general s opinion is to be followed , it is only considered . Since the year 2003 , advocate generals are only required to give their opinions in instances where a radical point of law is raised . The judgment passed by the Court is a result of a majority s decision and is pronounce at a public hearing . Opinions of dissent are not welcomed nor expressed and decisions are published on the mean solar daylight that the ve rdict is passed (European Union , 2007The European Court of Justice and exclusive Legal SystemsThere is evidently a case of diverging national and European legal systems . This is a complicated matter as the task of establishing a common set of principles adaptable to any member state is at and . The principles are needed to be in accordance to the incorporation of all the legal systems of the states admitted into the institution . It is rather difficult to compare which administrative law is to be used and which is not . Despite the complex nature of this matter , the ECJ has been successful in reconciling the different set of policies among states . A case law demonstrates that the Court was able to accomplish the blastoff of specific ideas and principles of British legal concepts into the European administrative law . There is a synthesis common law standards and principles of Continental administrative law . Another case demonstrated that there is a middle ground in settling legal impediments . The well-known AM-S case encounte! red by the court was a matter of an anti-dumping case on whitethorn 7 , 1991 . The purpose of estoppel derived from the Anglo-American legal tradition has not direct equivalent in Europe . The ECJ responded by synthesizing the legal argument of estoppel into preexisting legal concepts and notions at the community level . This evidently illustrates that the ECJ has every intention of adequately integrating concepts of national law and use this for the promotion of the most countenance standard of civil rights tax shelter and adjectival guarantees in Community Law (Schwarze 1992 :687Another controversial case face by the ECJ is the annulment of information plug with the get in concert States . On May 2006 , the Court has voided the deal between the European Union and the United States in requiring airlines to transfer passenger selective information to the US authorities . According to the Court , this information transfer has no appropriate legal basis , as it includes in formation regarding credit fluff details and addresses . The US claimed that this system would assist the identification of potential difference terrorists . Despite the decision , both EU and US officials are optimistic that a solution is available and can be found that would enable this transfer of information to push through . Demands stipulated in this proposal include the sending of European airlines to US authorities 34 items of individualised information on the include passengers after 15 minutes of take-off . America threatened that it would implement fines and would not allow the landing of airlines that would refuse to comply to this agreement . The US officials furthered by saying that in cases that the information asked were not sent in advance , the passengers would be subjected to long , therefore inconvenient , test from hostage crisps on arrival terminals . ascribable to the 9 /11 outrages America has demanded a more stringent security check by the airlines worldwide , as this attack was perpetrated through th! e use of hijacked airplanes as means to destroy key buildings in upstart(prenominal) York and Washington The European Parliament however debated on the failure of the US in providing guarantees that adequate levels of information protection would be enforced and that the very process of submitting the personal information of the passengers would appal their right to privacy . This is the reason that the European Union petitioned the European Court of Justice to annul the deal . This said argument however was not considered by the court and instead intemperate its decision through the examination of legal basis of data transfer . It argued that the EU Data shelter Directive , which was the basis of the decision made by the European Union and the European Commission in accepting the data collection , did not apply to data requested for security reasons Johannes Laitenberger , chief vox of the European Commission said that the ruling ensure that there is no lowering of data pro tection standards , no effect on passengers , no disruption of transatlantic air dealing , and that a high level of security is maintained until 30 September . The Commission is committed to works with all parties touch to find an appropriate arrangement by that time (BBC intelligence program , 2006ConclusionThe European Court of Justice is a body that is highly essential in the implementation of the agreements stipulated in the Treaties signed by member states . It is very esteemed and its power is accept and must never be undermined . Its decisions are seek and are not contested , as it is the branch that serves to rule over disputes among concerned parties whether it be between nations , individuals , or even companies It has a very significant role in the policy-making of the European Union member nations as it ensures that these countries would abide by what they have promised to do . It is the final court to be consulted in construe laws and implementing them , which co nsolidates a group of nations with individual identit! ies and systems of governance BibliographyAhearn , R .J . 2002 . hatful Policymaking in the European Union Institutional Framework[Online] . [December 23 , 2007] . operational from military personnel Wide WebBinder , D .S . 1995 . The European Court of Justice and the Protection of Fundamental Rights inthe European Community : New Developments and futurity Possibilities in Expanding Fundamental Rights Review to Member State Action [online] [December 23 , 2007] . usable from human race Wide Webp Borras , S , Jacobsson , K . 2004 . The method of co-ordination and new governance patterns in theEU . ledger of European Public Policy [Online] . 11 (2 ) [December 23 2007] , pp . 185-208 . forthcoming from World Wide WebHeclo , H . 1978 . Issue Networks and the Executive system in King Anthony (ed .The NewAmerican Political System . Washington DC : American Enterprise Institute .Heritier , A , Kerwer , D , Knill , C , Lehmkuhl , D , Teutsch , M Douillet , A (2001Differential Europ e . Maryland : Rowman and LittlefieldHix , S . 1999 : The political system of the European Union . Basingstoke MacmillanJeremy , Richardson (ed . 2001 . European Union : designer and Policy-making ThirdEdition . Oxford : RoutledgePollack , M .A . 2000 . The End of Creeping competence ? EU Polcy-Making Since MaastrichtJournal of Common Market Studies [Online] . 38 (3 ) [December 23 , 2007] pp . 519-38 . Available from World Wide WebRadaelli , C . 2003 : The Europeanisation of public policy . In Featherstone , K and Radelli , C(eds . The Politics of Europeanisation . Oxford : Oxford University PressRamussen , H . 1985 . On Law and Policy in the European Court of Justice Leiden : BrillSchwarze , J , European administrative law (1992 , Sweet Maxwell LondonTridimas , G , Tridimas , T . 2001 . interior(a) courts and the European Court of Justice : A publicchoice synopsis of the preliminary reference procedure . Journal of Economic publications classification [Online] . [December 23 , 2007] , pp 1-14 . Available from World Wide WebBBC N! ews . 2006 [Online] . [December 23 , 2007] . Available from World Wide Web Europa . 2007 [Online] . [December 23 , 2007] . Available from World Wide WebThe Columbia Encyclopedia . 2004 . s .v . European Union , 6th ed .. 16140PAGE 18 ...If you want to get a full essay, order it on our website: BestEssayCheap.com

If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: cheap essay